[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250917151259.29680Ba8-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 17:12:59 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nagarathnam Muthusamy <nagarathnam.muthusamy@...cle.com>,
Shannon Nelson <sln@...main.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/36] s390/time: Set up vDSO datapage later
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 04:00:22PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Upcoming changes to the generic vDSO library will mean that the vDSO
> datapage will not yet be usable during time_early_init().
>
> Move the initialization to time_init() which is called later. This is
> valid as the value of tod_clock_base.tod does not change during the
> lifetime of the machine and the vDSO datapage is only used much later.
This is not true; tod_clock_base is a union and the tod member is changed
implicitly within clock_sync_global():
tod_clock_base.eitod += delta;
However that happens only in stop_machine() context. Therefore moving the
initialization to time_init() is indeed ok, since it is called very early
when even preemption is still disabled.
I would appreciate if you would change the commit message a bit.
In any case:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists