linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] kbuild: keep .modinfo section in vmlinux.unstripped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aMpZ4Q6VFMFtXEkH@example.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 08:49:05 +0200
From: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] kbuild: keep .modinfo section in
 vmlinux.unstripped

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:10:10PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > yeah, it's actually because I dislike modifying vmlinux.unstripped in
> > the vmlinux rule.
> > 
> > But it may be that Nathan does not see it this way.
> 
> Yeah, I would agree that it is good form to avoid modifying the inputs
> of a rule.
> 
> This warning is pretty annoying since it is intentional but we do not
> have great tools to hide just this one instance it seems... This is
> probably worth a comment.
> 
> It would be nice if this section could be marked as NOLOAD from the
> beginning but that will mess with extracting .modinfo via objcopy from
> my brief testing.
> 

Yeah, I was thinking about that too.

Ok, I will make a new version of the patchset with fixes.

-- 
Rgrds, legion