[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85a46710-64ee-4a21-b95c-d4c18c2f634f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:52:24 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akhileshpatilvnit@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: rtc: Add ST m41t93
On 15/09/2025 16:19, Akhilesh Patil wrote:
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/st,m41t93.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: ST M41T93 RTC and compatible
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> Not much improved. This should be a person responsible/caring about this
>> hardware support in the kernel. Why would we want to take the binding if
>> no one cares about it?
>
> Okay. As per get_maintainer.pl, linux driver corresponding to this binding does not have a dedicated
> maintainer, hence it shows rtc subsystem maintainer (Alexandre Belloni).
And what did I express at v1?
> Looking forward for your suggestion here.
> What do you suggest to keep maintainer as Rob Herring or/and me ? as I see in
> such cases Rob is the maintainer.
No, I really doubt Rob cares about this particular hardware. Neither do
I, nor Conor.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists