[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250916181629.f4527e6e90d1e620e8d84abc@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:16:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, david@...hat.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, pfalcato@...e.de, kernel-team@...roid.com,
android-mm@...gle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara
<jack@...e.cz>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko
<mhocko@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri
Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin
Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Dave
Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: fix off-by-one error in VMA count limit
checks
On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:20:14 -0600 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:36:32 -0700 Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> >
> > lol.
> >
> > x1:/usr/src/25> grep "Fixes.*1da177e4c3f4" ../gitlog|wc -l
> > 661
> >
> > we really blew it that time!
>
> A few years back I made a list of the most-fixed commits in the kernel
> history; unsurprisingly that one (I call it the "original sin") came out
> on top:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/914632/
>
> Perhaps the time has come to update that analysis.
>
Hah, thanks, that's a fun article.
It's a shame it's so recent. I do recall back in maybe 2002 a fresh
young developer popped up with a massive rework of the IDE drivers. I
promptly took this into my tree because I was having a hate on the IDE
drivers at the time. omfg, what a disaster - this was the buggiest
bunch of junk conceivable and it went away after a few weeks.
I'm glad to say that the developer (email handle at the time was
"haveblue") has become better since then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists