[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMqlBvIBZJTkKD0l@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:09:42 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] printk: nbcon: Allow KDB to acquire the NBCON
context
On Mon 2025-09-15 08:20:32, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> KDB can interrupt any console to execute the "mirrored printing" at any
> time, so add an exception to nbcon_context_try_acquire_direct to allow
> to get the context if the current CPU is the same as kdb_printf_cpu.
>
> This change will be necessary for the next patch, which fixes
> kdb_msg_write to work with NBCON consoles by calling ->write_atomic on
> such consoles. But to print it first needs to acquire the ownership of
> the console, so nbcon_context_try_acquire_direct is fixed here.
>
> --- a/include/linux/kdb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kdb.h
> @@ -207,11 +207,17 @@ static inline const char *kdb_walk_kallsyms(loff_t *pos)
> /* Dynamic kdb shell command registration */
> extern int kdb_register(kdbtab_t *cmd);
> extern void kdb_unregister(kdbtab_t *cmd);
> +
> +#define KDB_IS_ACTIVE() (READ_ONCE(kdb_printf_cpu) != raw_smp_processor_id())
The condition looks inverted. It should be true when the CPU ID matches.
I actually think about using similar approach and naming scheme
as for the similar API checking @panic_cpu. There are patches
in -mm tree which consolidated that API, see
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250825022947.1596226-2-wangjinchao600@gmail.com
In our case, the similar API would be:
/* Return true when KDB has locked for printing a message on this CPU. */
static inline
bool kdb_printf_on_this_cpu(void)
{
/*
* We can use raw_smp_processor_id() here because the task could
* not get migrated when KDB has locked for printing on this CPU.
*/
return unlikely(READ_ONCE(kdb_printf_cpu) == raw_smp_processor_id());
}
> +
> #else /* ! CONFIG_KGDB_KDB */
> static inline __printf(1, 2) int kdb_printf(const char *fmt, ...) { return 0; }
> static inline void kdb_init(int level) {}
> static inline int kdb_register(kdbtab_t *cmd) { return 0; }
> static inline void kdb_unregister(kdbtab_t *cmd) {}
> +
> +#define KDB_IS_ACTIVE() false
and here to match the style above:
static inline bool kdb_printf_on_this_cpu(void) { return false };
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_KGDB_KDB */
> enum {
> KDB_NOT_INITIALIZED,
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/nbcon.c b/kernel/printk/nbcon.c
> index ff218e95a505fd10521c2c4dfb00ad5ec5773953..8644e019e2391797e623fcc124d37ed4d460ccd9 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/nbcon.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/nbcon.c
> @@ -248,13 +249,17 @@ static int nbcon_context_try_acquire_direct(struct nbcon_context *ctxt,
> * since all non-panic CPUs are stopped during panic(), it
> * is safer to have them avoid gaining console ownership.
> *
> - * If this acquire is a reacquire (and an unsafe takeover
> + * One exception is if kdb is active, which may print
> + * from multiple CPUs during a panic.
Also here the "active" is a bit ambiguous term. I would use:
* One exception is when kdb has locked for printing on this
* CPU.
> + *
> + * Second exception is a reacquire (and an unsafe takeover
> * has not previously occurred) then it is allowed to attempt
> * a direct acquire in panic. This gives console drivers an
> * opportunity to perform any necessary cleanup if they were
> * interrupted by the panic CPU while printing.
> */
> if (other_cpu_in_panic() &&
> + !KDB_IS_ACTIVE() &&
> (!is_reacquire || cur->unsafe_takeover)) {
> return -EPERM;
> }
I am sorry that I did not suggested the better names already when
this new API was discussed in v3.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists