[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aMwC4HAYjpWpZDMj@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 15:02:24 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <danielt@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] printk: nbcon: Export console_is_usable
On Wed 2025-09-17 10:07:47, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 09:21:48AM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> > >
> > > It means that Macros developed a patch and Petr reviewed it.
> > > The patch was not longer modified.
>
> That's not entirely correct. The signed-off trailer is used as the boundary
> indicating who was the person responsible for collecting the trailers. When
> the trailers are collected by the original author as part of their iteration
> cycles, their signed-off-by trailer goes below any trailers they have
> received.
This is an interesting interpretation. I am just curious. Has this
already been discussed anywhere, please?
It seems that the ordering of the trailers is not much described
in the process documentation, see
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists