lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp221d_RQmqoLDVxKOuphqASKK57UB4FzndKJFT5VBnHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:37:10 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, 
	Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, 
	Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] driver: reset: th1520-aon: add driver for
 poweroff/reboot via AON FW

On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 00:18, Sebastian Reichel
<sebastian.reichel@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:28:16PM -0700, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 08:22:02PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:49:05PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > > > This driver implements poweroff/reboot support for T-Head TH1520 SoCs
> > > > running the AON firmware by sending a message to the AON firmware's WDG
> > > > part.
> > > >
> > > > This is a auxiliary device driver, and expects the AON channel to be
> > > > passed via the platform_data of the auxiliary device.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > -- Sebastian
> >
> > Thanks for looking at this patch.
> >
> > What tree do you think it should go through?
>
> I'm fine with Uffe taking this together with the second patch or I
> can take it and provide an immutable branch once the second patch is
> ready.

Okay, when patch2 is good to go, I will pick up both patches (no need
for an immutable branch then), np!

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ