linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h5x088mt.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:31:06 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Linux PM
 <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] smp: Fix up and expand the smp_call_function_many()
 kerneldoc

On Tue, Sep 16 2025 at 16:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> The smp_call_function_many() kerneldoc comment got out of sync with the
>> function definition (bool parameter "wait" is incorrectly described as a
>> bitmask in it), so fix it up by copying the "wait" description from the
>> smp_call_function() kerneldoc and add information regarding the handling
>> of the local CPU to it.
>>
>> Fixes: 49b3bd213a9f ("smp: Fix all kernel-doc warnings")
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> It's been a week and no feedback.
>
> Well, in the further absence of any, I'll assume no concerns and just
> queue this up.

Sorry, was distracted. No objections from my side. Did you queue it
already?