[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0wm5wf3or.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:36:04 +0200
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Graf
<graf@...zon.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Changyuan Lyu
<changyuanl@...gle.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgg@...dia.com>, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, Pratyush
Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead
of storing addresses in fdt
On Wed, Sep 17 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> KHO test stores physical addresses of the preserved folios directly in
> fdt.
> Use kho_preserve_vmalloc() instead of it and kho_restore_vmalloc() to
> retrieve the addresses after kexec.
>
> This makes the test more scalable from one side and adds tests coverage
> for kho_preserve_vmalloc() from the other.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists