[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250918103638.77282-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:06:38 +0530
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
To: catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org
Cc: anshuman.khandual@....com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
ryan.roberts@....com,
baohua@...nel.org,
pjaroszynski@...dia.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Elide TLB flush in certain pte protection transitions
Currently arm64 does an unconditional TLB flush in mprotect(). This is not
required for some cases, for example, when changing from PROT_NONE to
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE (a real usecase - glibc malloc does this to emulate
growing into the non-main heaps), and unsetting uffd-wp in a range.
Therefore, implement pte_needs_flush() for arm64, which is already
implemented by some other arches as well.
Running a userspace program changing permissions back and forth between
PROT_NONE and PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, and measuring the average time taken
for the none->rw transition, I get a reduction from 3.2 microseconds to
2.95 microseconds, giving an 8.5% improvement.
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
---
mm-selftests pass. Based on 6.17-rc6.
arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 18a5dc0c9a54..4a566d589100 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -524,6 +524,35 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *b
{
__flush_tlb_range_nosync(mm, start, end, PAGE_SIZE, true, 3);
}
+
+static inline bool __pte_flags_need_flush(pteval_t oldval, pteval_t newval)
+{
+ pteval_t diff = oldval ^ newval;
+
+ /* invalid to valid transition requires no flush */
+ if (!(oldval & PTE_VALID) || (oldval & PTE_PRESENT_INVALID))
+ return false;
+
+ /* Transition in the SW bits and access flag requires no flush */
+ diff &= ~(PTE_SWBITS_MASK | PTE_AF);
+
+ if (!diff)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool pte_needs_flush(pte_t oldpte, pte_t newpte)
+{
+ return __pte_flags_need_flush(pte_val(oldpte), pte_val(newpte));
+}
+#define pte_needs_flush pte_needs_flush
+
+static inline bool huge_pmd_needs_flush(pmd_t oldpmd, pmd_t newpmd)
+{
+ return __pte_flags_need_flush(pmd_val(oldpmd), pmd_val(newpmd));
+}
+#define huge_pmd_needs_flush huge_pmd_needs_flush
+
#endif
#endif
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists