linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aM2kg49jBia4VKYr@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 19:44:19 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, ardb@...nel.org, dev.jain@....com,
	scott@...amperecomputing.com, cl@...two.org,
	Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block
 mapping when rodata=full

On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 01:00:49PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 19/09/2025 12:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> > So how about we:
> > 
> >   - Remove X4 from the list
> >   - I try harder to apply your patch for secondary CPUs...
> >   - ... if I fail, we can apply it next time around
> > 
> > Sound reasonable?
> 
> Yeah that works for me. Cheers!

So after all that, the conflict was straightforward once I sat down and
looked at it properly.

Please can you check for-next/core? I forcefully triggered the
repainting path in qemu and it booted without any problems.

Will