linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block mapping when rodata=full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3aadd340-f2e3-4926-8a39-69a0162eaa9d@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:15:12 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, ardb@...nel.org, dev.jain@....com,
 scott@...amperecomputing.com, cl@...two.org,
 Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: support FEAT_BBM level 2 and large block
 mapping when rodata=full

On 19/09/2025 19:44, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 01:00:49PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> On 19/09/2025 12:56, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> So how about we:
>>>
>>>   - Remove X4 from the list
>>>   - I try harder to apply your patch for secondary CPUs...
>>>   - ... if I fail, we can apply it next time around
>>>
>>> Sound reasonable?
>>
>> Yeah that works for me. Cheers!
> 
> So after all that, the conflict was straightforward once I sat down and
> looked at it properly.
> 
> Please can you check for-next/core? I forcefully triggered the
> repainting path in qemu and it booted without any problems.

Thanks Will, I took a look and didn't spot any problems. Thanks for squeezing
this in.

> 
> Will