[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175824455687.45175.3734166065458520748.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:15:56 +0900
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: dynevent: Add a missing lockdown check on dynevent
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Since dynamic_events interface on tracefs is compatible with
kprobe_events and uprobe_events, it should also check the lockdown
status and reject if it is set.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c b/kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c
index 5d64a18cacac..d06854bd32b3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_dynevent.c
@@ -230,6 +230,10 @@ static int dyn_event_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
int ret;
+ ret = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_TRACEFS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = tracing_check_open_get_tr(NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists