linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add device tree for ASRock Rack ALTRAD8 BMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2cecaf0b-9fb4-49f9-a346-ea3f44627a15@bsdio.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 14:47:29 -0600
From: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@...io.com>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add device tree for ASRock Rack ALTRAD8 BMC

On 9/21/25 20:40, Andrew Jeffery wrote:

> On Wed, 2025-09-17 at 12:04 -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>> aspeed-bmc-asrock-altrad8.dts:578.16-581.6: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /ahb/spi@...30000/flash@...artitions/code@...000: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /ahb/spi@...30000/flash@...artitions/tfa@...000)
> It seems odd that the partitions intersect. Are the offsets correct? If
> they are, can you add comments to the DTS discussing what's going on
> there?
I'll delete the code partition. I added it to make it easier for my 
script to flash both TF-A and UEFI areas at once.
>
>> aspeed-bmc-asrock-altrad8.dtb: gpio@1c (nxp,pca9557): '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@0', 'gpio@1', 'gpio@2', 'gpio@3', 'gpio@4', 'gpio@5', 'gpio@6', 'gpio@7' do not match any of the regexes: '^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$', '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
>> 	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml#
> This one needs fixing.

I'm confused, because in the existing device tree files I'm only seeing 
'hog' used in the &gpio node, while 'pca[0-9]+' is commonly used as the 
node names for pca95xx devices.

Does the gpio-pca95xx.yaml file need to be updated?


-- 

Rebecca Cran