[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250922080105-GYB1291757@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 16:01:05 +0800
From: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:RISC-V ARCHITECTURE" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:RISC-V SPACEMIT SoC Support" <spacemit@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] riscv: dts: spacemit: add 24c02 eeprom on BPI-F3
Hi Aurelien,
On 06:49 Mon 22 Sep , Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2025-09-22 11:21, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> >
> > On 23:01 Sun 21 Sep , Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > The BPI-F3 contains a 24c02 eeprom, that contains among other things the
> > > MAC addresses of the two network interfaces. For this reason, mark it as
> > > read-only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts | 11 ++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > index 3b6e4f52e9aad..574d10fdf9b82 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/spacemit/k1-bananapi-f3.dts
> > > @@ -115,6 +115,15 @@ &i2c2 {
> > > pinctrl-0 = <&i2c2_0_cfg>;
> > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > status = "okay";
> > > +
> > > + eeprom@50 {
> > > + compatible = "atmel,24c02";
> > > + reg = <0x50>;
> > > + vcc-supply = <&vcc1v8_sys>;
> > > + pagesize = <16>;
> > ..
> > > + read-only;
> > so you're sure there is no demand to write data to eeprom?
> > (update info at linux env)
>
> It seems to only contains board infos (mac addresses), but if there are
> other use cases, that can indeed be dropped.
>
On my second thought, I'm ok with it being "read-only", as we flash these
infos during firmware burning stage, then never alter them later.
> > > + size = <256>;
> > > + };
> > > };
> > >
> > > &i2c8 {
> > > @@ -143,7 +152,7 @@ buck2 {
> > > regulator-always-on;
> > > };
> > >
> > > - buck3 {
> > > + vcc1v8_sys: buck3 {
> > I'm not sure if adding an alias here is a good idea, it occurs buck3
> > serve the suppy for many devices, besides, to me it's more proper to
> > name it as eeprom_vcc1v8 for the eeprom according to schematics in
> > this case..
>
> We need to add a label to be able to reference it for the eeprom
> vcc-supply, but we'll have to also reference it for other devices (e.g.
> emmc, wifi, phys, etc... It tried to choose a common name, ie the right
> most one on the schematics. Another option could be to call it buck3,
> but other name suggestions are welcome.
how about simply making it "buck3_1v8", then probably add a comment
later in the eeprom node? to mapping to the shecmatics
vcc-supply = <&buck3_1v8>; /* EEPROM_VCC1V8 */
>
> --
> Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
> aurelien@...el32.net http://aurel32.net
--
Yixun Lan (dlan)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists