[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5305bd63-a393-ad9a-56a9-8eeb167e1b66@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:15:51 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nikunj@....com, Santosh.Shukla@....com,
Vasant.Hegde@....com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, bp@...en8.de,
David.Kaplan@....com, huibo.wang@....com, naveen.rao@....com,
tiala@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/17] KVM: SVM: Add IOAPIC EOI support for Secure
AVIC guests
On 9/23/25 00:03, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> While Secure AVIC hardware accelerates End-of-Interrupt (EOI) processing
> for edge-triggered interrupts, it requires hypervisor assistance for
> level-triggered interrupts originating from the IOAPIC. For these
> interrupts, a guest write to the EOI MSR triggers a VM-Exit.
>
> The primary challenge in handling this exit is that the guest's real
> In-Service Register (ISR) is not visible to KVM. When KVM receives an EOI,
> it has no direct way of knowing which interrupt vector is being
> acknowledged.
>
> To solve this, use KVM's software vAPIC state as a shadow tracking
> mechanism for active, level-triggered interrupts.
>
> The implementation follows this flow:
>
> 1. On interrupt injection (sev_savic_set_requested_irr), check KVM's
> software vAPIC Trigger Mode Register (TMR) to identify if the
> interrupt is level-triggered.
>
> 2. If it is, set the corresponding vector in KVM's software shadow ISR.
> This marks the interrupt as "in-service" from KVM's perspective.
>
> 3. When the guest later issues an EOI, the APIC_EOI MSR write exit
> handler finds the highest vector set in this shadow ISR.
>
> 4. The handler then clears the vector from the shadow ISR and calls
> kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated() to propagate the EOI to the virtual
> IOAPIC, allowing it to de-assert the interrupt line.
>
> This enables correct EOI handling for level-triggered interrupts in
> Secure AVIC guests, despite the hardware-enforced opacity of the guest's
> APIC state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 3e9cc50f2705..5be2956fb812 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -4474,7 +4474,9 @@ static void savic_handle_icr_write(struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_vcpu, u64 icr)
>
> static bool savic_handle_msr_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + struct kvm_lapic *apic;
> u32 msr, reg;
> + int vec;
>
> msr = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu);
> reg = (msr - APIC_BASE_MSR) << 4;
> @@ -4492,6 +4494,12 @@ static bool savic_handle_msr_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return true;
> }
> break;
> + case APIC_EOI:
> + apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> + vec = apic_find_highest_vector(apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + apic_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> + kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated(vcpu, vec);
> + return true;
Do you need to ensure that this is truly a WRMSR being done vs a RDMSR?
Or are you guaranteed that it is a WRMSR at this point?
Thanks,
Tom
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -5379,6 +5387,8 @@ void sev_savic_set_requested_irr(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool reinjected)
> vec = vec_start + vec_pos;
> apic_clear_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_IRR);
> val = val & ~BIT(vec_pos);
> + if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_TMR))
> + apic_set_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> } while (val);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists