[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNJDlIgBus9ksYE7@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:52:04 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...ecurity.net>, John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, Binbin Wu
<binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, "Maxim
Levitsky" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Xin Li" <xin@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 48/51] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG
coverage to MSRs test
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 03:32:55PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>When KVM_{G,S}ET_ONE_REG are supported, verify that MSRs can be accessed
>via ONE_REG and through the dedicated MSR ioctls. For simplicity, run
>the test twice, e.g. instead of trying to get MSR values into the exact
>right state when switching write methods.
>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists