lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNJcC3aAfJ-gCv6m@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:36:27 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the origin tree

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 10:25:12AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ceca927c86e6f ("arm64: mm: Fix CFI failure due to kpti_ng_pgd_alloc function signature")
> 
> from the origin tree and commit:
> 
>   fa93b45fd397e ("arm64: Enable vmalloc-huge with ptdump")
> 
> from the arm64 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 980d7745a5499,10c2580995814..0000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@@ -47,6 -49,15 +49,8 @@@
>   #define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS	BIT(1)
>   #define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS	BIT(2)	/* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */
>   
>  -enum pgtable_type {
>  -	TABLE_PTE,
>  -	TABLE_PMD,
>  -	TABLE_PUD,
>  -	TABLE_P4D,
>  -};
>  -
> + DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(arm64_ptdump_lock_key);
> + 

Thanks, the the correct resolution. I'll merge in for-next/fixes soon
(we have a dangling patch that depends on it) so this will disappear.

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ