[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923053803.0adee9a0@batman.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 05:38:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: fprobe: rename fprobe_entry to
fprobe_fgraph_entry
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:20:00 +0800
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
> The fprobe_entry() is used by fgraph_ops, so rename it to
> fprobe_fgraph_entry to be more distinctive.
The change log should be more specific and state that this will allow
to have fprobes to use ftrace too. I didn't know why you did this until
I saw the second patch. As change logs should be self contain, it
should have enough information to not rely on knowing other commits to
understand why the patch is made.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists