[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNKQZqWwWu_8WesG@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 15:19:50 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix reference count leak in
dma_buf_poll_add_cb()
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 02:00:28PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> On 23.09.25 13:14, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Call dma_fence_put(fence) if dma_fence_add_callback() fails.
>
> Well that change is obviously incorrect.
>
> When dma_fence_add_callback() fails we already call dma_fence_put() and drop the reference.
>
> When the dma_fence_add_callback() call succeeds the callback will drop the reference.
>
> The problem here is that the return code of dma_fence_add_callback() is an integer error code instead of a bool and basically has the reverse meaning than what people usually expect.
>
Ah, yes. You're exactly correct of course. Sorry about that.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists