[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250923082059.15fc17bc@batman.local.home>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:20:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] unwind_user/x86: Enable frame pointer unwinding
on x86
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:51:30 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Moo, and now you have me look at unwind/user.c:
>
> /* Make sure that the address is word aligned */
> shift = sizeof(long) == 4 ? 2 : 3;
> if (cfa & ((1 << shift) - 1))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Isn't that just:
>
> if (cfa & (sizeof(long) - 1))
>
> ?
>
> Let me go add a patch to clean that up...
Sure, as long as it's commented.
Thanks,
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists