[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAXyoMNBHgG-DFv16ua-T__iBXg=chFQ6TNoXdZvk4VP2aYESA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 20:33:57 +0800
From: Yangfl <mmyangfl@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 5/5] net: dsa: yt921x: Add support for
Motorcomm YT921x
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8:47 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
...
>
> > +static void yt921x_mdio_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> > +{
>
> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pp->mib_read);
> > + }
> > +
> > + dsa_unregister_switch(&priv->ds);
>
> The work canceling looks racy, the port can come up in between
> cancel_work and dsa_unregister ? disable_delayed_work.. will likely
> do the job.
Are you sure about this? There are many others who use
cancel_delayed_work_sync in their teardown methods (for example
ar9331_sw_remove). If that is true, they should be fixed too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists