lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nnvjazbxpywrmjnt67isba6m3ld6rqdaiid4qeczunmuablntz@vlbrjnxj5r2k>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:41:24 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Mahadevan <mahadevan.p@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: add DT changes to enable MDSS1
 and DPU

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 02:28:07PM +0530, Mahadevan wrote:
> Add devicetree changes to enable second Mobile Display
> Subsystem (MDSS1) and its Display Processing Unit(DPU) for
> Qualcomm LEMANS platform.

No outputs? Should it be enabled on any of the devices?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mahadevan <mahadevan.p@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi
> index 48f753002fc459a3e9fac0c0e98cbec6013fea0f..45c11c050d3f8853701fd20cf647aef5c6a9a8c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans.dtsi
> @@ -6751,6 +6751,94 @@ compute-cb@3 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		mdss1: display-subsystem@...00000 {

Why do you need this label?

> +			compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-mdss";
> +			reg = <0x0 0x22000000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "mdss";
> +
> +			/* same path used twice */
> +			interconnects = <&mmss_noc MASTER_MDP_CORE1_0 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> +					<&mmss_noc MASTER_MDP_CORE1_1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
> +					 &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> +					<&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ACTIVE_ONLY
> +					 &config_noc SLAVE_DISPLAY_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ACTIVE_ONLY>;
> +			interconnect-names = "mdp0-mem",
> +					     "mdp1-mem",
> +					     "cpu-cfg";
> +
> +			resets = <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_CORE_BCR>;
> +
> +			power-domains = <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_CORE_GDSC>;
> +
> +			clocks = <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_DISP1_HF_AXI_CLK>,
> +				 <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>;
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 865 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1800 0x402>;
> +
> +			#address-cells = <2>;
> +			#size-cells = <2>;
> +			ranges;
> +
> +			status = "disabled";
> +
> +			mdss1_mdp: display-controller@...01000 {

Why do you need this label?

> +				compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dpu";
> +				reg = <0x0 0x22001000 0x0 0x8f000>,
> +				      <0x0 0x220b0000 0x0 0x3000>;
> +				reg-names = "mdp", "vbif";
> +
> +				clocks = <&gcc GCC_DISP1_HF_AXI_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_LUT_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK>,
> +					 <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
> +				clock-names = "nrt_bus",
> +					      "iface",
> +					      "lut",
> +					      "core",
> +					      "vsync";
> +
> +				assigned-clocks = <&dispcc1 MDSS_DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK>;
> +				assigned-clock-rates = <19200000>;
> +
> +				operating-points-v2 = <&mdss1_mdp_opp_table>;
> +				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SA8775P_MMCX>;
> +
> +				interrupt-parent = <&mdss1>;
> +				interrupts = <0>;
> +
> +				mdss1_mdp_opp_table: opp-table {
> +					compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> +					opp-375000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <375000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs_l1>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-500000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-575000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <575000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_turbo>;
> +					};
> +
> +					opp-650000000 {
> +						opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <650000000>;
> +						required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_turbo_l1>;
> +					};
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +
>  		dispcc1: clock-controller@...00000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dispcc1";
>  			reg = <0x0 0x22100000 0x0 0x20000>;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 846bd2225ec3cfa8be046655e02b9457ed41973e
> change-id: 20250923-lemans_dual-c03ad5c84a84
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Mahadevan <mahadevan.p@....qualcomm.com>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ