[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNY3Ar8bernz4kCI@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:47:30 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markus Stockhausen <markus.stockhausen@....de>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
Harshal Gohel <hg@...onwunderlich.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/12] i2c: rtl9300: use regmap fields and API for
registers
Hi Jonas,
> I just noticed that it seems like an already applied patch got lost [1].
> This was supposed to be merged to Andi's i2c/i2c-host [2] and actually was
> there until the first three patches of this series got merged.
>
> Since I had already issue a few days ago trying to rebase the remaining
> patches, this might be the cause it also fails for you?
True. This patch somehow got lost and doesn't apply cleanly anymore
because of patch 3 of this series.
Are open to resend this series, rebased and with the lost patch added?
Thanks for the pointer,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists