linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH i2c-host v6] i2c: rtl9300: Implement I2C block read and write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aNZQnlUML0jIhXIM@shikoro>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 10:36:46 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Cc: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Harshal Gohel <hg@...onwunderlich.de>,
	Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-host v6] i2c: rtl9300: Implement I2C block read and
 write

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:34:40AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Friday, 26 September 2025 10:16:19 CEST Jonas Jelonek wrote:
> > Thanks for taking care of this quickly.
> > Maybe we should include another patch here which fixes the committed version
> > of my patch, i.e. removing I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK, with CC to stable. Since
> > the patch was also merged to stable, it is somewhat broken there now.
> 
> Yes, sounds good. Will submit it [1] tomorrow after the ~24h dwell time (if no 
> one else requests anything different).

I am getting a little confused already, so please make sure I know which
patches to apply where in what order.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)