[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNa069wZv1cn8VGh@tardis.local>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:44:43 -0700
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: phasta@...nel.org
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Asahi Lina <lina+kernel@...hilina.net>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>,
Krishna Ketan Rai <prafulrai522@...il.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rust: sync: Add dma_fence abstractions
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 10:48:06AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
[..]
> > >
> > > Regarding the manually created spinlock of mine: I so far never need
> > > that spinlock anywhere in Rust and wasn't sure what's then the best way
> > > to pass a "raw" spinlock to C.
> > >
> >
> > You can use `SpinLock<()>` for this purpose, no need to add new
> > bindings.
>
> The dma_fence C backend needs a spinlock pointer, given to it by the
> driver (so Rust code).
>
> How do I pass a SpinLock<()> to a C function? AFAICS SpinLock doesn't
> implement as_raw(), so I'd have to implement it, wouldn't I?
>
Technically you can use a `&raw` to get the address of the spinlock and
just use it, since `SpinLock<()>` is `repr(C)`, so it's transparent to a
spinlock_t. So you don't have to ;-)
However, while we are at it, it makes sense that we do it right.
> Or rather, as it looks, I'd have to implement it for SpinLockBackend?
>
I think the below should work, we already have a special from_raw() for
Lock<()>, it makes sense to have a special as_raw() as well.
Let me know if you want me to send a proper patch, or feel free to add
one in your patchset ;-)
diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
index 27202beef90c..78f3287a1372 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/lock.rs
@@ -160,6 +160,13 @@ pub unsafe fn from_raw<'a>(ptr: *mut B::State) -> &'a Self {
// `B::State`.
unsafe { &*ptr.cast() }
}
+
+ /// Obtains the raw pointer from a [`Lock`].
+ ///
+ /// This can be useful for working with a lock user outside Rust.
+ pub fn as_raw(&self) -> *mut B::State {
+ self.state.get()
+ }
}
impl<T: ?Sized, B: Backend> Lock<T, B> {
Regards,
Boqun
>
> P.
>
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250905044141.77868-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Boqun
> >
> > >
> > > So much from my side. Hope to hear from you.
> > >
> > > (I've compiled and tested this with the unit test on the current -rc3)
> > >
> > > Philipp
> > > ---
> > [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists