[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250926-drm-bridge-alloc-encoder-chain-mutex-v1-3-23b62c47356a@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:59:44 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] drm/bridge: lock the encoder bridge chain mutex during
insertion
drm_bridge_attach() modifies the encoder bridge chain, so take a mutex
around such operations to allow users of the chain to protect themselves
from chain modifications while iterating.
This change does not apply to drm_bridge_detach() because:
* only the drm_encoder.c calls it, not bridge drivers (unlike
drm_bridge_attach())
* the only drm_bridge_detach() caller is drm_encoder_cleanup() which
already locks the mutex for the entire cleanup loop, thus additionally
locking it here would deadlock
* drm_bridge_detach() is recursively calling itself along the chain, so
care would be needed to avoid deadlocks
Add a comment to clarify that is intended.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
index 630b5e6594e0affad9ba48791207c7b403da5db8..90e467cf91a134342c80d2f958b928472aaf0d8b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
@@ -453,10 +453,12 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_bridge *bridge,
bridge->dev = encoder->dev;
bridge->encoder = encoder;
+ drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder);
if (previous)
list_add(&bridge->chain_node, &previous->chain_node);
else
list_add(&bridge->chain_node, &encoder->bridge_chain);
+ drm_encoder_chain_unlock(encoder);
if (bridge->funcs->attach) {
ret = bridge->funcs->attach(bridge, encoder, flags);
@@ -487,7 +489,9 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_bridge *bridge,
err_reset_bridge:
bridge->dev = NULL;
bridge->encoder = NULL;
+ drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder);
list_del(&bridge->chain_node);
+ drm_encoder_chain_unlock(encoder);
if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
DRM_ERROR("failed to attach bridge %pOF to encoder %s: %d\n",
@@ -503,6 +507,11 @@ int drm_bridge_attach(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_bridge *bridge,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_bridge_attach);
+/*
+ * Invoked by the encoder during encoder cleanup in drm_encoder_cleanup(),
+ * so should generally *not* be called by driver code. As opposed to
+ * drm_bridge_attach(), does not lock the encoder chain mutex.
+ */
void drm_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
{
if (WARN_ON(!bridge))
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists