[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250926-drm-bridge-alloc-encoder-chain-mutex-v1-7-23b62c47356a@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:59:48 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/bridge: prevent encoder chain changes while
iterating in drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable/pre_enable()
Take the encoder chain mutex while iterating over the encoder chain in
drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable() and
drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post-disable().
These functions have nested list_for_each_*() loops, which makes them
complicated. list_for_each_entry_from() loops could be replaced by
drm_for_each_bridge_in_chain_from(), but it would not work in a nested
way. Besides, there is no "_reverse" variant of
drm_for_each_bridge_in_chain_from().
Keep code simple and readable by explicitly locking around the outer
loop. Thankfully there are no return points inside the loops, so the change
is trivial and readable.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
index 66c0a80db8426ffb360248895cfe2a11d6007ed7..00e0a88128d0eeabf25911591ad8c482d6c1caf8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
@@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
encoder = bridge->encoder;
+ drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder);
list_for_each_entry_from(bridge, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) {
limit = NULL;
@@ -813,6 +814,7 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
/* Jump all bridges that we have already post_disabled */
bridge = limit;
}
+ drm_encoder_chain_unlock(encoder);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable);
@@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
encoder = bridge->encoder;
+ drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &encoder->bridge_chain, chain_node) {
if (iter->pre_enable_prev_first) {
next = iter;
@@ -901,6 +904,7 @@ void drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
if (iter == bridge)
break;
}
+ drm_encoder_chain_unlock(encoder);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_bridge_chain_pre_enable);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists