[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iqkgyjncszycflptyrmnwfn7bvrkjt5poig5pnlwbjf3rvdka4@ermxt6v6nvqs>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 18:09:51 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryan-bt.tan@...adcom.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vishnu.dasa@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, berrange@...hat.com, Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/9] vsock: a per-net vsock NS mode state
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 04:43:45PM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
>Add the per-net vsock NS mode state. This only adds the structure for
>holding the mode and some of the functions for setting/getting and
>checking the mode, but does not integrate the functionality yet.
>
>Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
>---
>Changes in v6:
>- add orig_net_mode to store mode at creation time which will be used to
> avoid breakage when namespace changes mode during socket/VM lifespan
>
>Changes in v5:
>- use /proc/sys/net/vsock/ns_mode instead of /proc/net/vsock_ns_mode
>- change from net->vsock.ns_mode to net->vsock.mode
>- change vsock_net_set_mode() to vsock_net_write_mode()
>- vsock_net_write_mode() returns bool for write success to avoid
> need to use vsock_net_mode_can_set()
>- remove vsock_net_mode_can_set()
>---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> include/net/af_vsock.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/net_namespace.h | 4 ++++
> include/net/netns/vsock.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index 47bc35743f22..bc53c67e0926 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -26634,6 +26634,7 @@ L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> S: Maintained
> F: drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> F: include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+F: include/net/netns/vsock.h
> F: include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> F: net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> F: net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index d40e978126e3..2857e97699de 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>+#include <net/netns/vsock.h>
> #include <net/sock.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/vm_sockets.h>
>
>@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ struct vsock_sock {
> u32 peer_shutdown;
> bool sent_request;
> bool ignore_connecting_rst;
>+ enum vsock_net_mode orig_net_mode;
Why `orig_` prefix?
Maybe I need to review all the series, but it's a bit confusing for now.
I guess it's related to the new behaviour to not change the mode of
already created sockets (which I like), but IMHO this variable prefix is
confusing.It seems we will have another field with the "actual_" mode,
but if it's immutable, I'd avoid that prefix.
>
> /* Protected by lock_sock(sk) */
> u64 buffer_size;
>@@ -256,4 +258,57 @@ static inline bool vsock_msgzerocopy_allow(const struct vsock_transport *t)
> {
> return t->msgzerocopy_allow && t->msgzerocopy_allow();
> }
>+
>+static inline enum vsock_net_mode vsock_net_mode(struct net *net)
>+{
>+ enum vsock_net_mode ret;
>+
>+ spin_lock_bh(&net->vsock.lock);
>+ ret = net->vsock.mode;
>+ spin_unlock_bh(&net->vsock.lock);
>+ return ret;
>+}
>+
>+static inline bool vsock_net_write_mode(struct net *net, u8 mode)
>+{
>+ bool ret;
>+
>+ spin_lock_bh(&net->vsock.lock);
>+
>+ if (net->vsock.written) {
>+ ret = false;
>+ goto skip;
>+ }
>+
>+ net->vsock.mode = mode;
>+ net->vsock.written = true;
>+ ret = true;
>+
>+skip:
>+ spin_unlock_bh(&net->vsock.lock);
>+ return ret;
>+}
>+
>+/* Return true if vsock_sock passes the mode rules for a given net and
>+ * orig_net_mode. Otherwise, return false.
>+ *
>+ * net is the current net namespace of the object being checked. orig_net_mode
>+ * is the mode of net when the object was created.
`orig_net_mode` is also explained in the next paragraph, should we
remove from here?
>+ *
>+ * orig_net_mode is the mode of arg 'net' at the time of creation for the
>+ * object being checked. For example, if searching for a vsock_sock then
>+ * orig_net_mode is arg net's mode at the time the vsock_sock was created.
>+ *
>+ * Read more about modes in the comment header of net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c.
>+ */
>+static inline bool vsock_net_check_mode(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct net *net,
>+ enum vsock_net_mode orig_net_mode)
>+{
>+ struct net *vsk_net = sock_net(sk_vsock(vsk));
>+
>+ if (net_eq(vsk_net, net))
>+ return true;
>+
>+ return orig_net_mode == VSOCK_NET_MODE_GLOBAL && vsk->orig_net_mode == VSOCK_NET_MODE_GLOBAL;
nit: I'd rewrite in this way, just because it seems easy to read to me,
but again not strong opinion, this is fine:
return orig_net_mode == VSOCK_NET_MODE_GLOBAL &&
orig_net_mode == vsk->orig_net_mode;
>+}
> #endif /* __AF_VSOCK_H__ */
>diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
>index 025a7574b275..005c0da4fb62 100644
>--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
>+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
>@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> #include <net/netns/smc.h>
> #include <net/netns/bpf.h>
> #include <net/netns/mctp.h>
>+#include <net/netns/vsock.h>
> #include <net/net_trackers.h>
> #include <linux/ns_common.h>
> #include <linux/idr.h>
>@@ -196,6 +197,9 @@ struct net {
> /* Move to a better place when the config guard is removed. */
> struct mutex rtnl_mutex;
> #endif
>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VSOCKETS)
>+ struct netns_vsock vsock;
>+#endif
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> #include <linux/seq_file_net.h>
>diff --git a/include/net/netns/vsock.h b/include/net/netns/vsock.h
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..d4593c0b8dc4
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/include/net/netns/vsock.h
>@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>+#ifndef __NET_NET_NAMESPACE_VSOCK_H
>+#define __NET_NET_NAMESPACE_VSOCK_H
>+
>+#include <linux/types.h>
>+
>+enum vsock_net_mode {
>+ VSOCK_NET_MODE_GLOBAL,
>+ VSOCK_NET_MODE_LOCAL,
>+};
>+
>+struct netns_vsock {
>+ struct ctl_table_header *vsock_hdr;
sysctl_header, or sysctl_hdr, or sysctl_ctl ?
I'd remove `vsock_` prefix and make more clear its used for sysctl.
>+ spinlock_t lock;
>+
>+ /* protected by lock */
>+ enum vsock_net_mode mode;
>+ bool written;
I would call this `mode_set` or `mode_locked`, I mean with `mode_`
prefix to make sure we don't need to rename it when we will add new
fields in the future.
Thanks
Stefano
>+};
>+#endif /* __NET_NET_NAMESPACE_VSOCK_H */
>
>--
>2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists