[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNhlAyxlUR27eERC@shikoro>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 00:28:19 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Cc: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>,
Harshal Gohel <hg@...onwunderlich.de>,
Simon Wunderlich <sw@...onwunderlich.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-host-fixes i2c-host v7 1/2] i2c: rtl9300: Drop
unsupported I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA
On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 11:52:16AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> While applying the patch for commit ede965fd555a ("i2c: rtl9300: remove
> broken SMBus Quick operation support"), a conflict was incorrectly solved
> by adding the I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK feature flag. But the code to handle
> I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA requests will be added by a separate commit.
>
> Fixes: ede965fd555a ("i2c: rtl9300: remove broken SMBus Quick operation support")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.13+
> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>
Applied to for-current with $subject fixed to match the correct FUNC
flag, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists