[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250927-spoon-yearning-c1a8df796173@spud>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 23:31:05 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Linear Technology
LTM8054 regulator
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 05:59:48PM +0200, Romain Gantois wrote:
> Hello Conor,
>
> On Thursday, 25 September 2025 21:27:06 CEST Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Romain Gantois wrote:
> ...
> > > +properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + const: adi,ltm8054
> > > +
> > > + enable-gpios:
> > > + description: GPIO connected to the RUN pin.
> > > + maxItems: 1
> > > +
> >
> > > + lltc,fb-voltage-divider:
> > Why does this property have a ?linear? vendor prefix?
> > Shouldn't it be adi to match the other property and compatible?
>
> This component was originally from Linear Technology, before it was acquired
> by Analog Devices. The new properties and compatibles have the Analog Devices
> prefix, but the "fb-voltage-divider" property is already used by the LTC3676
> and LTC3589 regulators, so I left the Linear Technology prefix for this one to
> avoid introducing a new property just to specify a vendor prefix change.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about this though.
Do they share the same driver?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists