[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aNxCoN2fP4aEAH2i@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 21:50:40 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: ixp4xx: Guard ARM32-specific hook_fault_code()
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 08:59:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 10:27 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >
> > hook_fault_code() is an ARM32-specific API. Guard it and related code with
> > CONFIG_ARM #ifdefs so the driver can be compile tested on other
> > architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> It looks OK to me
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ar.org>
>
> I see some other ARM32 drivers use it too, but we surely do
> not have a arch-agnostic way of handling bus errors so perhaps it
> need to be like this.
>
> I think Russell created the fault hooks originally so CC:ing him
> in.
I wonder what the point of compile testing if it needs code to be
#ifdef'd out.
Wouldn't it be better to add something like:
#ifndef CONFIG_ARM
static inline void hook_fault_code(int n, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int,
struct pt_regs *),
int sig, int code, const char *name)
{
}
#endif
maybe to a local header that pci-imx6, pci-keystone, pcie-rcar-host
and pci-ixp4xx can all share?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists