linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: document the RPMh Network-On-Chip interconnect in Kaanapali SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <70569fdf-7a3a-495a-b1ca-d35ae1963592@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:36:07 +0530
From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...aro.org>,
        Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Georgi Djakov
 <djakov@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
        trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: document the RPMh
 Network-On-Chip interconnect in Kaanapali SoC



On 9/25/2025 6:10 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/25/25 10:57 AM, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/25/25 02:02, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>> From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> Document the RPMh Network-On-Chip Interconnect of the Kaanapali platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@....qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - qcom,kaanapali-aggre-noc
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does Kaanapali have a single aggre node, or there are several ?
>> On previous SoC, I see there are two (aggre1 and aggre2).
>> Also in your driver (second patch), I notice aggre1_noc and aggre2_noc .
>> It would make sense to accurately describe here the hardware.
> 
> They're physically separate
> 
Yes, they are physically separate but the topology treats them as a single noc
with two slave connections to system noc which you have noticed in the topology file.

Thanks,
Raviteja.

> Konrad