[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250930173950.5d7636e2@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:39:50 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri <bhanuseshukumar@...il.com>
Cc: Thangaraj.S@...rochip.com, Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, o.rempel@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+62ec8226f01cb4ca19d9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Fix lost EEPROM read timeout
error(-ETIMEDOUT) in lan78xx_read_raw_eeprom
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:19:02 +0530 Bhanu Seshu Kumar Valluri wrote:
> + if (dev->chipid == ID_REV_CHIP_ID_7800_) {
> + int rc = lan78xx_write_reg(dev, HW_CFG, saved);
> + /* If USB fails, there is nothing to do */
> + if (rc < 0)
> + return rc;
> + }
> + return ret;
I don't think you need to add and handle rc here separately?
rc can only be <= so save the answer to ret and "fall thru"?
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists