[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251001114053.242997aa@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 11:40:53 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: jpoimboe@...nel.org, rostedt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] unwind: Simplify unwind_user_faultable()
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:59:56 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/unwind/deferred.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
> +++ b/kernel/unwind/deferred.c
> @@ -128,17 +128,15 @@ int unwind_user_faultable(struct unwind_
>
> cache = info->cache;
> trace->entries = cache->entries;
> -
> - if (cache->nr_entries) {
> + trace->nr = cache->nr_entries;
> + if (trace->nr) {
> /*
> * The user stack has already been previously unwound in this
> * entry context. Skip the unwind and use the cache.
> */
> - trace->nr = cache->nr_entries;
> return 0;
> }
Could we turn the above into:
/*
* If the user stack has already been previously unwound in this
* entry context. Skip the unwind and use the cache.
*/
if (trace->nr)
return 0;
So we could remove the squiggly brackets?
-- Steve
>
> - trace->nr = 0;
> unwind_user(trace, UNWIND_MAX_ENTRIES);
>
> cache->nr_entries = trace->nr;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists