[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251002-unloving-unrobed-b35543f729f2@spud>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:44:55 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Jun Guo <Jun.Guo@...tech.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: xilinx: add soc-specific spi
compatibles for zynqmp/versal-net
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 08:06:47AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 10/1/25 20:31, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/versal-net.dtsi | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi | 4 ++--
>
> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
>
> Do you expect to go via SPI tree or via SOC tree?
Via SOC would be preferred, there's no functional change and I don't
think the dtbs_check warnings are worth doing something abnormal, as
long as what's in linux-next is clean.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists