linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: xilinx: add soc-specific spi compatibles for zynqmp/versal-net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251002-unloving-unrobed-b35543f729f2@spud>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 10:44:55 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Jun Guo <Jun.Guo@...tech.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: xilinx: add soc-specific spi
 compatibles for zynqmp/versal-net

On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 08:06:47AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 10/1/25 20:31, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/versal-net.dtsi | 4 ++--
> >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi     | 4 ++--
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
> 
> Do you expect to go via SPI tree or via SOC tree?

Via SOC would be preferred, there's no functional change and I don't
think the dtbs_check warnings are worth doing something abnormal, as
long as what's in linux-next is clean.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)