[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e4b995e-57ae-412f-ae88-c3708a5f67ee@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 14:41:18 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: david@...t.cz, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
Casey Connolly <casey@...nolly.tech>,
Joel Selvaraj <foss@...lselvaraj.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Pixel 3 and Pixel 3
XL
On 10/5/25 3:16 PM, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>
> This adds initial device tree support for the following phones:
>
> - Google Pixel 3 (blueline)
> - Google Pixel 3 XL (crosshatch)
>
> Both phone boards use the same identifiers and differ only slightly
> in their connected peripherals.
>
> Supported functionality includes:
> - Debug UART
> - UFS
> - Charger
> - USB-C (peripheral mode)
> - Display (Pixel 3 only)
>
> GPIOs 0–3 and 81–84 are not accessible from the application CPUs,
> so they are marked as reserved to allow the Pixel 3 to boot.
>
> The rmtfs region is allocated using UIO, making it technically "dynamic."
>
> Its address and size can be read from sysfs:
>
> $ cat /sys/class/uio/uio0/name
> /sys/class/uio/uio0/maps/map0/addr
> 0x00000000f2701000
>
> $ cat /sys/class/uio/uio0/maps/map0/size
> 0x0000000000200000
>
> Like the OnePlus 6, the Pixel 3 requires 1 kB of reserved memory on either
> side of the rmtfs region to work around an XPU bug that would otherwise
> cause erroneous violations when accessing the rmtfs_mem region.
[...]
> +&gmu {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
It's already enabled> +
> +&mdss {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_dsi0 {
> + status = "okay";
> + vdda-supply = <&vdda_mipi_dsi0_1p2>;
'status' should be last, with a \n before it
> +
> + ports {
> + port@1 {
> + endpoint {
&mdss_dsi0_out {} instead
> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> + qcom,te-source = "mdp_vsync_e";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + panel@0 {
> + compatible = "lg,sw43408";
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + vddi-supply = <&vreg_l14a_1p88>;
> + vpnl-supply = <&vreg_l28a_3p0>;
> +
> + reset-gpios = <&tlmm 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&panel_reset_pins &panel_te_pin &panel_pmgpio_pins>;
property-n
property-names
in this order, please
> +
> + port {
> + panel_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dsi0_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_dsi0_out {
> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> +};
(as mentioned above..)
[...]
> + /* rmtfs lower guard */
> + memory@...00000 {
> + reg = <0 0xf2700000 0 0x1000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +
> + rmtfs_mem: memory@...01000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,rmtfs-mem";
> + reg = <0 0xf2701000 0 0x200000>;
> + no-map;
> +
> + qcom,client-id = <1>;
> + qcom,vmid = <15>;
> + };
> +
> + /* rmtfs upper guard */
> + memory@...01000 {
> + reg = <0 0xf2901000 0 0x1000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
qcom,use-guard-pages instead
[...]
> + vreg_l14a_1p88: ldo14 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> + regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + /*
> + * We can't properly bring the panel back if it gets turned off
> + * so keep it's regulators always on for now.
> + */
> + regulator-always-on;
Sounds like your panel driver is not sequencing things properly
[...]
> +&uart9 {
> + label = "LS-UART1";
This is a 96boards-ism> +
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_1 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_1_dwc3 {
> + dr_mode = "peripheral";
Are you sure?
[...]
> +&usb_2 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&usb_2_dwc3 {
> + dr_mode = "host";
Does the phone actually have something connected to both USB hosts?
Would that be the weasel(?) security chip?
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-google-crosshatch.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-google-crosshatch.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..dc9938ffc0ab8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-google-crosshatch.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sdm845-google-common.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Google Pixel 3 XL";
> + compatible = "google,crosshatch", "qcom,sdm845";
> +
> + battery: battery {
> + compatible = "simple-battery";
> +
> + charge-full-design-microamp-hours = <3480000>;
> + voltage-min-design-microvolt = <3600000>;
> + voltage-max-design-microvolt = <4400000>;
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + /* for u-boot */
> + framebuffer: framebuffer@...00000 {
> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
> + reg = <0 0x9d400000 0 (2960 * 1440 * 4)>;
> + width = <1440>;
> + height = <2960>;
> + stride = <(1440 * 4)>;
> + format = "a8r8g8b8";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + reserved-memory {
> + framebuffer_region@...00000 {
> + no-map;
> + reg = <0 0x9d400000 0 0x02400000>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&gmu {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mdss {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
I'm sure you can push some of this into -common
> +
> +&mdss_dsi0 {
> + vdda-supply = <&vdda_mipi_dsi0_1p2>;
> +
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + ports {
> + port@1 {
> + endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> + qcom,te-source = "mdp_vsync_e";
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + panel@0 {
> + compatible = "samsung,s6e3ha8";
> + reg = <0>;
> +
> + vci-supply = <&vreg_l28a_3p0>; // downstream
which supply should /* upstream */ use then? :(
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists