linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 05/12 for v6.18] pidfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251006-liedgut-leiden-f3d51f4242c2@brauner>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 15:48:11 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 05/12 for v6.18] pidfs

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 04:18:12PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/26, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > Oleg Nesterov (3):
> >       pid: make __task_pid_nr_ns(ns => NULL) safe for zombie callers
> ...
> > gaoxiang17 (1):
> >       pid: Add a judgment for ns null in pid_nr_ns
> 
> Oh... I already tried to complain twice
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250819142557.GA11345@redhat.com/
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250901153054.GA5587@redhat.com/
> 
> One of these patches should be reverted. It doesn't really hurt, but it makes
> no sense to check ns != NULL twice.

Sorry, those somehow got lost.
Do you mind sending me a revert?