[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0347woui2.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 18:38:45 +0200
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, jasonmiu@...gle.com,
graf@...zon.com, changyuanl@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
dmatlack@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, corbet@....net,
rdunlap@...radead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
kanie@...ux.alibaba.com, ojeda@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
masahiroy@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
yoann.congal@...le.fr, mmaurer@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
chenridong@...wei.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mark.rutland@....com,
jannh@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com, joel.granados@...nel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, anna.schumaker@...cle.com, song@...nel.org,
zhangguopeng@...inos.cn, linux@...ssschuh.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org, cw00.choi@...sung.com,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, yesanishhere@...il.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, leon@...nel.org, lukas@...ner.de,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, wagi@...nel.org, djeffery@...hat.com,
stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, lennart@...ttering.net, brauner@...nel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
saeedm@...dia.com, ajayachandra@...dia.com, jgg@...dia.com,
parav@...dia.com, leonro@...dia.com, witu@...dia.com,
hughd@...gle.com, skhawaja@...gle.com, chrisl@...nel.org,
steven.sistare@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/30] kho: drop notifiers
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 06 2025, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Hi Pasha,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
>> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>>
>> The KHO framework uses a notifier chain as the mechanism for clients to
>> participate in the finalization process. While this works for a single,
>> central state machine, it is too restrictive for kernel-internal
>> components like pstore/reserve_mem or IMA. These components need a
>> simpler, direct way to register their state for preservation (e.g.,
>> during their initcall) without being part of a complex,
>> shutdown-time notifier sequence. The notifier model forces all
>> participants into a single finalization flow and makes direct
>> preservation from an arbitrary context difficult.
>> This patch refactors the client participation model by removing the
>> notifier chain and introducing a direct API for managing FDT subtrees.
>>
>> The core kho_finalize() and kho_abort() state machine remains, but
>> clients now register their data with KHO beforehand.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
>
> This patch breaks build of test_kho.c (under CONFIG_TEST_KEXEC_HANDOVER):
>
> lib/test_kho.c:49:14: error: ‘KEXEC_KHO_ABORT’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> 49 | case KEXEC_KHO_ABORT:
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> [...]
> lib/test_kho.c:51:14: error: ‘KEXEC_KHO_FINALIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> 51 | case KEXEC_KHO_FINALIZE:
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> [...]
>
> I think you need to update it as well to drop notifier usage.
Here's the fix. Build passes now and the test succeeds under my qemu
test setup.
--- 8< ---
>From a8e6b5dfef38bfbcd41f3dd08598cb79a0701d7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 18:35:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! kho: drop notifiers
Update KHO test to drop the notifiers as well.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
---
lib/test_kho.c | 32 +++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
index fe8504e3407b5..e9462a1e4b93b 100644
--- a/lib/test_kho.c
+++ b/lib/test_kho.c
@@ -38,33 +38,6 @@ struct kho_test_state {
static struct kho_test_state kho_test_state;
-static int kho_test_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd,
- void *v)
-{
- struct kho_test_state *state = &kho_test_state;
- struct kho_serialization *ser = v;
- int err = 0;
-
- switch (cmd) {
- case KEXEC_KHO_ABORT:
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
- case KEXEC_KHO_FINALIZE:
- /* Handled below */
- break;
- default:
- return NOTIFY_BAD;
- }
-
- err |= kho_preserve_folio(state->fdt);
- err |= kho_add_subtree(ser, KHO_TEST_FDT, folio_address(state->fdt));
-
- return err ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_DONE;
-}
-
-static struct notifier_block kho_test_nb = {
- .notifier_call = kho_test_notifier,
-};
-
static int kho_test_save_data(struct kho_test_state *state, void *fdt)
{
phys_addr_t *folios_info;
@@ -111,6 +84,7 @@ static int kho_test_prepare_fdt(struct kho_test_state *state)
fdt = folio_address(state->fdt);
+ err |= kho_preserve_folio(state->fdt);
err |= fdt_create(fdt, fdt_size);
err |= fdt_finish_reservemap(fdt);
@@ -194,7 +168,7 @@ static int kho_test_save(void)
if (err)
goto err_free_folios;
- err = register_kho_notifier(&kho_test_nb);
+ err = kho_add_subtree(KHO_TEST_FDT, folio_address(state->fdt));
if (err)
goto err_free_fdt;
@@ -309,7 +283,7 @@ static void kho_test_cleanup(void)
static void __exit kho_test_exit(void)
{
- unregister_kho_notifier(&kho_test_nb);
+ kho_remove_subtree(folio_address(kho_test_state.fdt));
kho_test_cleanup();
}
module_exit(kho_test_exit);
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists