lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mC5pWz92KYtOhtgOcMuTeuzOeM9xrbkna+HkrwHAQqVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 18:40:20 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "dakr@...nel.org" <dakr@...nel.org>, 
	Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, "bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com" <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Timur Tabi <ttabi@...dia.com>, 
	"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Elle Rhumsaa <elle@...thered-steel.dev>, 
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, 
	Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, 
	"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] rust: bitfield: Add KUNIT tests for bitfield

On Sat, Oct 4, 2025 at 6:14 PM Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it can be efficient. It really depends. I have been contributing upstream for about 15 years if you see the git log, often when someone chats privately with me like you did and they told me they are ok with a patch, I save them the trouble and add their review tag especially after they already added their tag to all my other patches. Surprisingly though this is probably the first time anyone has been pissed off about it.  Anyway I will not add your tag henceforth unless you publicly reply (or you let me know otherwise by chat).

If they just say they are OK with a patch, that would just mean an
Acked-by, not a Reviewed-by.

In any case, the documentation states those tags cannot be added
without permission -- if someone gives you a tag privately, it is best
that you tell them to please send it in the mailing list instead. That
way there is no confusion and others (including tooling, e.g.
patchwork and b4) can see it.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ