[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c87d45dc-d545-4359-9e2f-11e43a45859f@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 15:06:08 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sidharth Seela <sidharthseela@...il.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev,
varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david.hunter.linux@...il.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: at91: sam9x7: Use kmalloc_array() instead of
kmalloc()
On 9/24/25 08:55, Sidharth Seela wrote:
> Replace kmalloc with kmalloc array in clk/at91/sam9x7.c. Refactor to new
> API, for cases with dynamic size calculations inside kmalloc().
>
This following line doesn't belong in commit log.
Can you add details on how you tested this patch and also how
you found the problem to begin with.
> Resend is to correct previously sent patches mailing address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sidharth Seela <sidharthseela@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> index ffab32b047a0..0c0a746a183d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> @@ -748,9 +748,9 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
> if (!sam9x7_pmc)
> return;
>
> - clk_mux_buffer = kmalloc(sizeof(void *) *
> - (ARRAY_SIZE(sam9x7_gck)),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + clk_mux_buffer = kmalloc_array(ARRAY_SIZE(sam9x7_gck),
> + sizeof(void *),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!clk_mux_buffer)
> goto err_free;
>
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists