linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: at91: sam9x7: Use kmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJE-K+A_xFPPDbPFQiOwH5nUJdrrGHxvV9xVppXWTNJ5g2bUHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:07:00 +0530
From: Sidharth Seela <sidharthseela@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, 
	alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, 
	varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	david.hunter.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: at91: sam9x7: Use kmalloc_array() instead of kmalloc()

On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 2:36 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This following line doesn't belong in commit log.

This was one of my early patches. It won't happen again.

> Can you add details on how you tested this patch and also how
> you found the problem to begin with.

I used grep to find instances of kmalloc and went through the ones
with size calculations inside them.
I did compile testing, My mistake, I forgot to add request for test.
I would like to retract this patch for the same.

-- 
Thanks,
Sidharth Seela
www.realtimedesign.org