[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2aaf169a-3dab-4ddc-a095-396619983406@tuxon.dev>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 12:00:01 +0200
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Sidharth Seela <sidharthseela@...il.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
david.hunter.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] clk: at91: sam9x7: Use kmalloc_array() instead of
kmalloc()
Hi, Sidharth,
On 9/24/25 17:55, Sidharth Seela wrote:
> Replace kmalloc with kmalloc array in clk/at91/sam9x7.c. Refactor to new
> API, for cases with dynamic size calculations inside kmalloc().
>
> Resend is to correct previously sent patches mailing address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sidharth Seela <sidharthseela@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> index ffab32b047a0..0c0a746a183d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sam9x7.c
> @@ -748,9 +748,9 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
> if (!sam9x7_pmc)
> return;
>
> - clk_mux_buffer = kmalloc(sizeof(void *) *
> - (ARRAY_SIZE(sam9x7_gck)),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + clk_mux_buffer = kmalloc_array(ARRAY_SIZE(sam9x7_gck),
> + sizeof(void *),
sizeof(*clk_mux_buffer)
Also, this line should be aligned on the above "(". Please run checkpatch.pl.
Could you please update the other at91 clock drivers?
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> + GFP_KERNEL);
This like could fit on the above one.
Thank you,
Claudiu
> if (!clk_mux_buffer)
> goto err_free;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists