[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251007165732.66949558.ddiss@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:57:32 +1100
From: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: dima@...sta.com, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier
<nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Schier <nsc@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gen_init_cpio: Do fsync() only on regular files
On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 21:40:03 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 12:55:03AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
> >
> > Here at Arista gen_init_cpio is used in testing in order to create
> > an initramfs for specific tests. Most notably, there is a test that does
> > essentially a fork-bomb in kdump/panic kernel, replacing build-time
> > generated init script: instead of doing makedumpfile, it does call
> > shell tests.
>
> Why is is using fsync at all? Seems like this was added in
>
> commit ae18b94099b04264b32e33b057114024bc72c993
> Author: David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
> Date: Tue Aug 19 13:05:45 2025 +1000
>
> gen_init_cpio: support -o <output_file> parameter
>
> without any good explanation. In general doing a per-file fsync
> is going to horrible wreck performance, and given that no one is
> interested in partial initramfs archives also rather pointless.
I should have explained why in the commit, sorry. The intention was to
catch any FS I/O errors during output archive writeback. fsync() is
called only once as the final I/O.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists