lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd54058e-0208-4357-8a5b-4c6bb9f6cfb9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:51:56 +0200
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Stanislav Jakubek
 <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/9] clk: bcm: kona: Add bus clock support, bus
 clocks for BCM21664/BCM281xx



On 25.09.2025 23:04, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/19/2025 10:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Florian Fainelli (2025-09-04 11:28:34)
>>> On 9/1/25 10:07, Artur Weber wrote:
>>>> This patchset does the following:
>>>>
>>>> - Introduce support for bus clocks. These are fairly similar to
>>>>     peripheral clocks, but only implement policy, gate and hyst.
>>>>
>>>> - Add matching bus clocks for BCM21664 and BCM281xx peripheral clocks
>>>>     and update device tree bindings to match.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Stephen, are you OK with taking all of those patches through the clock
>>> tree? Patches #8 and #9 have a dependency on patches #2 and #3.
>>>
>>
>> I don't normally do that but sure. Is that a Reviewed-by?
> 
> Sure, let's make it official:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
> 
> if you prefer that I take those patches through the ARM SoC tree, that 
> works just as well, I would need a suitable acknowledgement from you to 
> do that.
> 
> Thanks

If it helps, I could re-submit the DTS commits as a separate patchset, 
and only keep the clock subsystem changes here. Then the clock patchset
can be merged first, and the DTS patchset can be merged once that lands.

Best regards
Artur

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ