linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/9] clk: bcm: kona: Add bus clock support, bus clocks for BCM21664/BCM281xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7eed7848-b3ca-4415-85c6-7267c91560a6@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:04:06 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Stanislav Jakubek
 <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/9] clk: bcm: kona: Add bus clock support, bus
 clocks for BCM21664/BCM281xx



On 9/19/2025 10:34 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Florian Fainelli (2025-09-04 11:28:34)
>> On 9/1/25 10:07, Artur Weber wrote:
>>> This patchset does the following:
>>>
>>> - Introduce support for bus clocks. These are fairly similar to
>>>     peripheral clocks, but only implement policy, gate and hyst.
>>>
>>> - Add matching bus clocks for BCM21664 and BCM281xx peripheral clocks
>>>     and update device tree bindings to match.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
>>
>> Stephen, are you OK with taking all of those patches through the clock
>> tree? Patches #8 and #9 have a dependency on patches #2 and #3.
>>
> 
> I don't normally do that but sure. Is that a Reviewed-by?

Sure, let's make it official:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>

if you prefer that I take those patches through the ARM SoC tree, that 
works just as well, I would need a suitable acknowledgement from you to 
do that.

Thanks
-- 
Florian