linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Pinefeat cef168 lens control board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b5f080f-2c18-43e7-9c47-b5b09847c51d@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 08:46:44 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Aliaksandr Smirnou <asmirnou@...efeat.co.uk>,
 jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com, hverkuil@...all.nl, mchehab@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Pinefeat cef168 lens control board

On 08/10/2025 04:57, Aliaksandr Smirnou wrote:
> Add the Device Tree schema and examples for the Pinefeat cef168 lens
> control board. This board interfaces Canon EF & EF-S lenses with
> non-Canon camera bodies, enabling electronic control of focus and
> aperture via V4L2.
> 
> Power supply is derived from fixed supplies via connector or GPIO
> header. Therefore, the driver does not manage any regulator, so
> representing any supply in the binding is redundant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aliaksandr Smirnou <asmirnou@...efeat.co.uk>

You already got review at v4! Why are you forcing us to do the job
multiple times?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof