[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251008213233.8541-1-asmirnou@pinefeat.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:32:33 +0100
From: Aliaksandr Smirnou <asmirnou@...efeat.co.uk>
To: conor@...nel.org
Cc: asmirnou@...efeat.co.uk,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
hverkuil@...all.nl,
jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Pinefeat cef168 lens control board
On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 21:47:29 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 06:50:36PM +0100, Aliaksandr Smirnou wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 21:47:29 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >
> > > I acked v5, any reason for not applying it?
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251007-geologic-epidemic-2f667f232cf6@spud/#t
> >
> > Yes, the dt-bindings patch can be applied.
> > The v6 series does not change anything in the dt-bindings patch - only
> > another patch in the series was updated, so v6 was sent.
> >
> > Apologies - I wasn't aware that an acked patch could be omitted from
> > the new revision.
>
> No no, it's not that it should have been omitted - it's that you should
> have applied my ack on v5 when submitting your v6. I guess timing worked
> against you because I sent it like 20 mins before you sent v6.
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Thanks for clarifying. I'll make sure to include your Acked-by tag in the
next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists