[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251008-pushiness-underwent-a1f0450a933f@spud>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 19:31:57 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Aliaksandr Smirnou <asmirnou@...efeat.co.uk>
Cc: conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Pinefeat cef168 lens control board
On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 06:50:36PM +0100, Aliaksandr Smirnou wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 21:47:29 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > I acked v5, any reason for not applying it?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251007-geologic-epidemic-2f667f232cf6@spud/#t
>
> Yes, the dt-bindings patch can be applied.
> The v6 series does not change anything in the dt-bindings patch - only
> another patch in the series was updated, so v6 was sent.
>
> Apologies - I wasn't aware that an acked patch could be omitted from
> the new revision.
No no, it's not that it should have been omitted - it's that you should
have applied my ack on v5 when submitting your v6. I guess timing worked
against you because I sent it like 20 mins before you sent v6.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists