[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251008081359.1382699-1-namcao@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:13:59 +0000
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc, ocxl: Fix extraction of struct xive_irq_data
Commit cc0cc23babc9 ("powerpc/xive: Untangle xive from child interrupt
controller drivers") changed xive_irq_data to be stashed to chip_data
instead of handler_data. However, multiple places are still attempting to
read xive_irq_data from handler_data and get a NULL pointer deference bug.
Update them to read xive_irq_data from chip_data.
Non-XIVE files which touch xive_irq_data seem quite strange to me,
especially the ocxl driver. I think there ought to be an alternative
platform-independent solution, instead of touching XIVE's data directly.
Therefore, I think this whole thing should be cleaned up. But perhaps I
just misunderstand something. In any case, this cleanup would not be
trivial; for now, just get things working again.
Fixes: cc0cc23babc9 ("powerpc/xive: Untangle xive from child interrupt controller drivers")
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/68e48df8.170a0220.4b4b0.217d@mx.google.com/
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
---
VAS and OCXL has not been tested. I noticed them while grepping.
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c | 12 ++++--------
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 2 +-
drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
index 1302b5ac5672..89a1b8c21ab4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
@@ -916,8 +916,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_attach_escalation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 prio,
* it fires once.
*/
if (single_escalation) {
- struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(xc->esc_virq[prio]);
- struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
+ struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(xc->esc_virq[prio]);
xive_vm_esb_load(xd, XIVE_ESB_SET_PQ_01);
vcpu->arch.xive_esc_raddr = xd->eoi_page;
@@ -1612,7 +1611,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_set_mapped(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long guest_irq,
/* Grab info about irq */
state->pt_number = hw_irq;
- state->pt_data = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(host_data);
+ state->pt_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(host_data);
/*
* Configure the IRQ to match the existing configuration of
@@ -1787,8 +1786,7 @@ void kvmppc_xive_disable_vcpu_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
void xive_cleanup_single_escalation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
- struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
- struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
+ struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
/*
* This slightly odd sequence gives the right result
@@ -2827,9 +2825,7 @@ int kvmppc_xive_debug_show_queues(struct seq_file *m, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
i0, i1);
}
if (xc->esc_virq[i]) {
- struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(xc->esc_virq[i]);
- struct xive_irq_data *xd =
- irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
+ struct xive_irq_data *xd = irq_get_chip_data(xc->esc_virq[i]);
u64 pq = xive_vm_esb_load(xd, XIVE_ESB_GET);
seq_printf(m, " ESC %d %c%c EOI @%llx",
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c
index b65256a63e87..9c9650319f3b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int init_vas_instance(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- xd = irq_get_handler_data(vinst->virq);
+ xd = irq_get_chip_data(vinst->virq);
if (!xd) {
pr_err("Inst%d: Invalid virq %d\n",
vinst->vas_id, vinst->virq);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
index 625361a15424..8d0123b0ae84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c
@@ -1580,7 +1580,7 @@ static void xive_flush_cpu_queue(unsigned int cpu, struct xive_cpu *xc)
cpu, irq);
#endif
raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
- xd = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ xd = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc);
/*
* Clear saved_p to indicate that it's no longer pending
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c
index 36f7379b8e2d..f6b821fc274c 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/afu_irq.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ u64 ocxl_afu_irq_get_addr(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id)
mutex_lock(&ctx->irq_lock);
irq = idr_find(&ctx->irq_idr, irq_id);
if (irq) {
- xd = irq_get_handler_data(irq->virq);
+ xd = irq_get_chip_data(irq->virq);
addr = xd ? xd->trig_page : 0;
}
mutex_unlock(&ctx->irq_lock);
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists